Are you really trying to suggest that police brutality is caused by cancel culture? That the natural consequences of attempting to address problematic language

Are you really trying to suggest that police brutality is caused by cancel culture? That the natural consequences of attempting to address problematic language include the rampant murder of minorities by members of law enforcement? > You don't get to cancel others for their word-violence and then turn around and complain when your peers try to put a stop yours. Time to grow up. Hoo boy. This shouldn't need to be said, but there is absolutely no equivalence whatsoever between an individuals right to refuse to associate with "Stop the Steal" people, and LEOs being entitled to murder whoever they feel like without repercussion. Is this sarcasm? The mental gymnastics here are so insane I have to question your sincerity in posting this. > words and subtle actions can be micro-aggressive and thus are violent This is not what the term microaggression means. Microagressions do not imply violence.