> I am confused. Are you arguing that this is a thing that happens? they simply have better tools than hitmen, but, for example https://www.businessinsider.in

> I am confused. Are you arguing that this is a thing that happens? they simply have better tools than hitmen, but, for example https://www.businessinsider.in/policy/news/former-ceo-of-amazon-mexico-paid-a-hitman-to-gun-down-his-wife-in-front-of-her-2-children-court-hears/articleshow/92165508.cms https://www.businessinsider.in/policy/news/former-ceo-of-ama... https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/clearly-lasik-co-founder-gets-20-year-sentence-for-murder-for-hire-plot/ https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/clearly-lasik-co-f... > we know that governments do this sort of thing all the time. they also have better tools than hiring hitmen contract killing is a fraction of all the homicides OP asked how the multi billionaire CEO of a trillion dollars company could kill someone He could simply hire an hitman, it would cost him peanuts If the victim is also using one of the products the company makes, they would also be in possession of all the information an hitman would need to complete his task, no investigation would be necessary