4 ms·
Like a chain of blocks? Where each block is signed by adding a prefix that produces an increasingly difficult hash?
by ooterness 3y ago
Like a chain of blocks? Where each block is signed by adding a prefix that produces an increasingly difficult hash?
- snapplebobapple 3y agosomeone should combine a chain of blocks for identity management with one for financial transactions/tokens and one for signature attestation. We could call it the cube chain and usher in web 4.0.....
- cseleborg 3y agoWait... You're talking about Git, right? Brilliant idea! You could sign a pull request, and once it's signed, you can then merge the businesses. But how do you show a diff of the signature? And what if it's not for a corporate merger?
- TheNewsIsHere 3y agoThat’s just crazy talk. Corporate mergers are the only transactions there are!
- xur17 3y agoBut what keeps someone from forking your git repository and insisting that their HEAD is the source of truth? How can we get a globally agreed upon source of truth?
- yokem55 3y agoIt could probably be done with a merkle based signature log that whoever is hosting the service could provide. To cheat, the party hosting it would probably have to forge signatures for everyone after the disputed signature.
- yencabulator 3y agoAs long as we're talking about non-cryptographic-signatures, the party hosting the e-signing software can claim any signature to have happened at any time. The whole point was DocuSign would be unlikely to do this.
- shmichael 3y agoI have Zero Knowledge about this topic