4 ms·
Oddly, Safari Tech Preview on Ventura advertises support for JXL but the images don't actually render. So the linked page has almost no images, just broken plac
by jshier 3y ago
Oddly, Safari Tech Preview on Ventura advertises support for JXL but the images don't actually render. So the linked page has almost no images, just broken placeholders.
- malnourish 3y agoThe images shown to me are .avif (Firefox and Chrome on Windows)
- ComputerGuru 3y agoThe header image I see is indeed an AVIF but it depends on what your browser sends in the `Accept` header. Chrome sends image/avif,image/webp,image/apng,image/svg+xml,image/*,*/*;q=0.8 but if you drop image/avif from there you get a webp and if also drop image/webp from the header you finally end up with a jpeg. However if you manually request that image with a custom `image/jxl` at the start of the `Accept:` header, you get a JPEG XL result. So GP is correct, but you won't see that behavior except on their PC (errr, Mac) -- unless you use Firefox and enable JPEGXL support in about:config, of course.
- jshier 3y agoThe STP request includes jxl. image/webp,image/avif,image/jxl,image/heic,image/heic-sequence,video/;q=0.8,image/png,image/svg+xml,image/;q=0.8,/;q=0.5
- ComputerGuru 3y agoYeah, I was explaining how you could reproduce those results without being on the Safari preview.
- markdog12 3y agoThe image formats (at least newer ones) in Safari defer to OS support, so you'll need Sonoma to view JXL in Safari.
- jshier 3y agoThen you'd think STP wouldn't offer support for JXL. But it does, both to the site itself and in the release notes.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]