4 ms·
If they choose to sure, but I dont see what incentive they would have. After all, the post is about a company removing products from a market rather than being
by tifik 3y ago
If they choose to sure, but I dont see what incentive they would have. After all, the post is about a company removing products from a market rather than being subject to a law that would allow the gov to force them to do so.
- smoldesu 3y ago> but I dont see what incentive they would have. They are frequently subpoenaed for information, and turn over that data more often than not: https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html https://www.apple.com/legal/transparency/us.html
- tifik 3y agoYeah, because they are asked to/legally required. I was questioning incentives to hand over information on their own accord, just because they can.
- smoldesu 3y agoAll of these are their own accord. That's even what OP's article is about - if Apple is legally required to break their encryption in the EU, then they will discontinue their product. Let's not pretend this is a privacy-motivated decision. Where Apple doesn't have negotiating power (eg. China) they have been forced to compromise user safety and privacy[0]. We live in a post XKeyscore world, pretending like this doesn't also happen in America or the UK is a bedtime story for helpless capitalists. [0] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208351 https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208351 edit: s/EU/UK
- MichaelZuo 3y agoHuh? Isn't this story about the possibility of the UK government legally requiring Apple to do something?