No need to add the extra bit - at the top end 289 transactions per seconds is not something you'd probably want to choose SQLite for, but PG/MySQL/SQL Server wo

No need to add the extra bit - at the top end 289 transactions per seconds is not something you'd probably want to choose SQLite for, but PG/MySQL/SQL Server would do that fine and require a lot less feeding (though any database with traffic or size needs some care.)