3 ms·
> There's something just morally wrong about wanting to exist in an endgame society that decides its best to give zero credit to creators of ideas. > I refuse t
by pravus 3y ago
> There's something just morally wrong about wanting to exist in an endgame society that decides its best to give zero credit to creators of ideas.
> I refuse that and actually would go to war over it.
It is absolutely morally debased and corrupt to advocate violence to resolve intellectual pursuits. I want to exist in a society that shares ideas since they are not scarce and we can argue over the actually scarce things we care about.
- gmd63 3y agoIt's morally debased and corrupt to treat deep thinkers like plants that can be harvested, their entire lives and experiences consumed to enjoy the fruits of their intellectual labor. It's just personal preference, like all politics. We create the world we want to live in. Yes, I once idealized your society, but after years in the corporate world I learned there will always be plenty of snakes out there. I'd prefer not structuring society in a way that rewards them even more.