4 ms·

Threads reportedly lost half its Active Users in a week, Zuck: 10s of Mils daily

3 points by archo 3y ago

archo 3y ago
https://archive.is/0SPam https://archive.is/0SPam <Full Title> Threads has reportedly lost half of its active users in just a week as Zuckerberg claims ‘10s of millions now come back daily’
ChrisArchitect 3y ago
[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734
- archo 3y ago
  Not a Dupe; that article is from : https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-active-users-a-week-after-launch/ https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-acti...
  - beardyw 3y ago
    I think the op meant "this topic has been discussed already". It is useful to avoid duplicate discussions.
    - archo 3y ago
      Normally tagged with; Related. Threads has lost half of its daily active users a week after launch - 2023-07-18 (53-comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734
      - ChrisArchitect 3y ago
        no, not related. It's the same story just posted somewhere else. And there's a bunch of discussion 2 days ago about it. Dupe.
        archo 3y ago
        A Duplicate refers to the same Article source URL, or a word for word copy of the Story submitted to two different Publishers. This is neither, two different Stories on the same Subject, by two different Authors. By Joe Wituschek - https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-active-users-a-week-after-launch/ https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-acti... BY Chris Morris - https://fortune.com/2023/07/18/threads-loses-half-active-users-mark-zuckerberg/ https://fortune.com/2023/07/18/threads-loses-half-active-use... If you claim the above are Duplicates, then you must also deem Wikipedia #Userbase a Duplicate as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(social_network)#Userbase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(social_network)#Userb...
        ChrisArchitect 3y ago
        you new here? It's common to point out duplicates as stories reporting on the same topic and directing to where the conversation is happening on them consolidating. Posting this 2 days after the news when there's a large discussion about it isn't helping anything. We're not trying to have the discussion split up over days of different posts, c'mon.
        archo 3y ago
        You may ask yourself, " How does Dan do it " https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805838 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805838
        ChrisArchitect 3y ago
        Related is not Dupe. Just don't post stories that already have threads. That's it.
        archo 3y ago
        You seem to think that News is a forever fixed settled contextual proposition from one perspective, News changes in time. >Just don't post stories that already have threads. That's it. I did Not post a Duplicate, period!

3 points by archo 3y ago

https://archive.is/0SPam https://archive.is/0SPam <Full Title> Threads has reportedly lost half of its active users in just a week as Zuckerberg claims ‘10s of millions now come back daily’

ChrisArchitect 3y ago

[dupe] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734

archo 3y ago
Not a Dupe; that article is from : https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-active-users-a-week-after-launch/ https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-acti...
- beardyw 3y ago
  I think the op meant "this topic has been discussed already". It is useful to avoid duplicate discussions.
  - archo 3y ago
    Normally tagged with; Related. Threads has lost half of its daily active users a week after launch - 2023-07-18 (53-comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36766734
    - ChrisArchitect 3y ago
      no, not related. It's the same story just posted somewhere else. And there's a bunch of discussion 2 days ago about it. Dupe.
      - archo 3y ago
        A Duplicate refers to the same Article source URL, or a word for word copy of the Story submitted to two different Publishers. This is neither, two different Stories on the same Subject, by two different Authors. By Joe Wituschek - https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-active-users-a-week-after-launch/ https://bgr.com/tech/threads-has-lost-half-of-its-daily-acti... BY Chris Morris - https://fortune.com/2023/07/18/threads-loses-half-active-users-mark-zuckerberg/ https://fortune.com/2023/07/18/threads-loses-half-active-use... If you claim the above are Duplicates, then you must also deem Wikipedia #Userbase a Duplicate as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(social_network)#Userbase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threads_(social_network)#Userb...
        ChrisArchitect 3y ago
        you new here? It's common to point out duplicates as stories reporting on the same topic and directing to where the conversation is happening on them consolidating. Posting this 2 days after the news when there's a large discussion about it isn't helping anything. We're not trying to have the discussion split up over days of different posts, c'mon.
        archo 3y ago
        You may ask yourself, " How does Dan do it " https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805838 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805838
        ChrisArchitect 3y ago
        Related is not Dupe. Just don't post stories that already have threads. That's it.
        archo 3y ago
        You seem to think that News is a forever fixed settled contextual proposition from one perspective, News changes in time. >Just don't post stories that already have threads. That's it. I did Not post a Duplicate, period!