3 ms·
not saying those papers are wrong, but 136 years and millions of speakers from _most_ countries and Esperanto's speakers seem just fine without adding irregular
by masukomi 3y ago
not saying those papers are wrong, but 136 years and millions of speakers from _most_ countries and Esperanto's speakers seem just fine without adding irregular verbs.
- eru 3y agoTurkish might be a better example: it's a real, natural language and highly regular.
- nine_k 3y agoSame with Japanese, apparently a completely unrelated, differently structured language.
- majewsky 3y agoFun fact: A subset of the linguistic community conjectures that Japanese and Korean are part of the same family as the Turkic languages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages
- nine_k 3y agoYes, but it's a really remote relationship, if it exists.