2 ms·
I don't understand what you're arguing for. Science is responsible for information warfare? Huh? > We might assume that this roughly correlates with positions
by imiric 3y ago
I don't understand what you're arguing for. Science is responsible for information warfare? Huh?
> We might assume that this roughly correlates with positions that you do and do not agree with.
I'm not agreeing nor disagreeing with anything in that paragraph. I'm just pointing out that the bullshit TFA refers to are signs of information warfare, and that the sociopolitical climate we've seen in Western countries in recent years is a clear effect of it. I'm also saying that nudging people to think critically can help a small percentage of people, as the referenced study shows, but that this isn't a cure for the high efficacy of IW.