4 ms·
I think there's an obvious business model. It's "fire everyone." #1 in traffic, forget all the web 2.0 stuff, mindshare, and cut costs to the bone. Use the prof
by ojbyrne 18y ago
I think there's an obvious business model. It's "fire everyone." #1 in traffic, forget all the web 2.0 stuff, mindshare, and cut costs to the bone. Use the profits to concentrate on more cost cutting, more efficiency. Concentrate on being cheaper at everything. Where stuff is free, use the cost savings to show less ads. In business they call this strategy "low-cost provider."
- immad 18y agoWould that not be the way to guarantee that they never do anything innovative ever and let other people eat away at there market cap?
- markessien 18y agoThat must be the most retarded thing I've ever read. If they cost costs everywhere, then where will new income come from?
- ojbyrne 18y agoAsk Walmart. Or Toyota. Or any other number of companies who've used cost as a competitive weapon.
- markessien 18y agoYahoo is falling behind because it's stagnant, not because its cost are too high. Yahoos products are mostly free, and it's a very different industry from retailing or machine manufacturing. Yahoo does not need to cut costs. Cashflow is fine in the company. Cutting costs would be silly at this junction - it does nothing at all to address the problem. It's like a guy who gets his leg cut off, and your solution is to bind the leg. Yes, that helps, but he'll still die if you don't actually fix the wound.
- jbenz 18y agoI'm an advertiser and I've spoken at length with Yahoo's display advertising department. Their costs are too high. Search ads on Yahoo are great, however.
- Hexstream 18y agoI didn't know "suicide" was a business model.