4 ms·
I think there is a significant difference between an LLM and your other examples. Society is a lot more fragile than many people believe. Most people aren’t T
by r3trohack3r 3y ago
I think there is a significant difference between an LLM and your other examples.
Society is a lot more fragile than many people believe.
Most people aren’t Ted Kazinsky.
And most wanna be Ted Kazinsky’s that we’ve caught don’t have super smart friends they can call up and ask for help in planning their next task.
But a world where every disgruntled person who aims to do the most harm has an incredibly smart friend who is always DTF no matter the task? Who is capable of reeling them in to be more pragmatic about sowing chaos, death, and destruction?
That world is on the horizon, it’s something we are going to have to adapt to, and it’s significantly different than Notepad++. It’s also significantly different than you, assuming you are not willing to help your neighbor get away with serial murder.
I think this is something that’s going to significantly increase the sophistication of bad actors in our society and I think that outcome is inevitable at this point. I don’t think this is “the end times” - nor do I think trying to align and regulate LLMs is going to be effective unless training these things continues to require a supply chain that’s easily monitored and controlled. Every step we take towards training LLMs on commodity/consumer hardware is a step away from effective regulation, and selfishly a step I support.
- samr71 3y agoWhat will happen is that this tech will advance, and regular joes will have access to the "TERRIFYING" unaligned models - and nothing will happen. This stuff isn't magic. Wannabe Ted Kaczynski will ask BasedGPT how to build bombs , it will tell them, and nothing will happen because building bombs and detonating them and not getting caught is REALLY HARD. The limiting factor for those seeking wanton destruction is not a lack of know-how, but a lack of talent/will. Do we get ~1-4 new mass shootings a year? Seems reasonable but doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things. (That's like, what, a day of driving fatalities?) Unaligned publicly available powerful AI ("Open" AI, one might say) is a net good. The sooner we get an AI that will tell us how to cook meth and make nuclear bombs, the better.
- TeeMassive 3y agoThe vas majority of data these models are built from are from public sources. It's already out there. LLMs are just a way to aggregate pre-existing knowledge. And there are also Ted Kazinsky in the goovernment and big corporations with way more power and way less accountability. Dispowering the public is counter-productive here.