I know I'm going to be downvoted to hell but: As long as it's not a forced choice, the user buys the drugs at their own will, knows exactly what they are getti

I know I'm going to be downvoted to hell but: As long as it's not a forced choice, the user buys the drugs at their own will, knows exactly what they are getting and the odds of addiction (if the chemist clearly states that, say, there is 1/1000 of "being addicted" some random thing and the does is indeed randomized to produce that outcome 1/1000 of the time fairly), and even the outcome is not real money, could the dealers really be held responsible for anything? It's a free market and someone did a terrible choice. Condolences to their family, yet... As a for profit company it's perfectly normal for a company to follow tactics that guide the user into spending, it's called, well, business. So we should sue everybody? Of course not. Purdue Pharma is just playing by the playbook, which is perfectly normal for a company to maximize the profit. As long as they don't outright lie like saying you can get some addicted 1/1000000 of chance but it's actually 1/10, they should be fine.