> If your "good" architecture is slowing down development i.e. more time more labor [...] The argument is that it isn't slowing down development in the long ru

> If your "good" architecture is slowing down development i.e. more time more labor [...] The argument is that it isn't slowing down development in the long run. Because it is a fundamental part of your architecture anyway. (And my argument has nothing to do with Rust per se)