3 ms·
Thanks. Frankly, the reason we have a separate fork is because some of our changes to rrweb in the early days were "hacky" to the say the least, and given that
by podoman 3y ago
Thanks. Frankly, the reason we have a separate fork is because some of our changes to rrweb in the early days were "hacky" to the say the least, and given that their team is part time on the project, there was occasionally a long cycle to get changes in.
We do have plans to consolidate one day, and I understand your sentiment about making diffs hard.
Fwiw, even beyond sponsoring the project, we even sponsored some folks on their team to work on particular features in the privacy and webgl space, so we have a really good relationship at this point.
I'll talk to the team regarding consolidating at this point. I appreciate the message.
- HyprMusic 3y agoThanks, I appreciate the response. Re-reading my original post, it came off more aggressively than I indented. It's just frustrating to see so many "open-source" companies use rrweb as a big selling point in their product yet not give anything back in terms of financial support or contributions (present company excluded of course). That's great to hear, thank you for supporting open-source! I'll be sure to give your product a trial.
- podoman 3y agoAll good, these are very valid points. Thanks for feedback and definitely give highlight a try when you get a chance.