4 ms·
This seems very much aimed at teams on paid tiers at competitors (which admittedly makes sense). As an individual user, I find their feature set (https://www.n
by nearting 3y ago
This seems very much aimed at teams on paid tiers at competitors (which admittedly makes sense).
As an individual user, I find their feature set (https://www.neeto.com/neetocal/features https://www.neeto.com/neetocal/features) a bit underwhelming - they present a number of features as things that really any scheduler should have:
- different meeting durations
- time zones
- custom availability
- cancellation/rescheduling
- buffer time
- integrations with Zoom/Google/etc (but not CalDAV, somehow)
- email notifications, OTP and SSL (what is this, 2013?)
Personally, I use cal.com, which has all of that, plus is open source and self-hostable. And it interfaces with CalDAV so I'm not locked into Google Calendar.
- Peer_Rich 3y agothank you for supporting us! The CalDAV integration alone took a ton of engineering hours because every provider has implemented this protocol differently