I agree with a lot of what you’re saying but their bias isn’t just their ideology, the article itself is just false with bad math. They claim at the beginning t

I agree with a lot of what you’re saying but their bias isn’t just their ideology, the article itself is just false with bad math. They claim at the beginning the avian flu was more severe and wave hands at population growth to explain how 1.13m deaths in a 331m population is less severe than 0.116 deaths in a 159m population. No where do they quote the covid death toll, nor the actual populations at the time. This is presumably because they intend to mislead their readers with an overt falsehood. That is lying, and lends credence to such a stark bias they’re willing to directly lie to deceive their readers into believing their points. These were essentially the only actual facts quoted in the entire article. That sorta makes them shitty.