3 ms·
Anyone that agrees to doing the work of the level above you before getting promoted is agreeing to be exploited. They want you to do this because they know ther
by treyfitty 3y ago
Anyone that agrees to doing the work of the level above you before getting promoted is agreeing to be exploited. They want you to do this because they know there’s enough suckers. Don’t be a sucker.
- gwright 3y agoThis seems to be a very naive view of the way people and organizations work. It is quite typical for managers to delegate projects/efforts/initiatives to a subordinate for the express purpose of giving them an opportunity to develop and demonstrate the skills they will need in a future position/promotion. If I assigned a stretch opportunity to one of my direct reports and their response was that they needed a promotion before they would do that work, that would be strong evidence that they were not going to be progressing anytime soon.
- lolinder 3y agoRather than assume malicious intent, I think there's a very reasonable explanation for this policy: it avoids the Peter Principle. If someone is content to stay at their current level, that's fine, they can stay there. But if they want a promotion, they need to show that they have the skills that are expected at that level. The company has to decide if they want some people to permanently hold positions beyond their capabilities (Peter Principle), some people to temporarily hold positions below their capabilities (while working towards a promotion), or if they want to regularly demote people who aren't able to do their job. Demotions absolutely kill morale, as does having a bunch of unqualified people in high-level positions. The least bad option is to require people to do the work of the position they want to hold.