3 ms·
Yes, the first part is what I was going for. Actually it is even worse than that, because C++ has a more limited syntax. Rust's syntax and semantics must supp
by binary132 3y ago
Yes, the first part is what I was going for. Actually it is even worse than that, because C++ has a more limited syntax. Rust's syntax and semantics must support more features. This fundamentally limits its accessibility.