3 ms·
I think the idea is that being the next C++ means being just as hard to write as C++, and then saying "why do we need the next C++ when we already have C++?", b
by foota 3y ago
I think the idea is that being the next C++ means being just as hard to write as C++, and then saying "why do we need the next C++ when we already have C++?", but I'm curious if my interpretation is right :)
- binary132 3y agoYes, the first part is what I was going for. Actually it is even worse than that, because C++ has a more limited syntax. Rust's syntax and semantics must support more features. This fundamentally limits its accessibility.