You're tilting at windmills. The science done in the article is fine science. Drawing parallels between the models is good and not woo The question that start

You're tilting at windmills. The science done in the article is fine science. Drawing parallels between the models is good and not woo The question that started this thread is: >Aren't quantum effects supposed to disappear in the macroscopic world Which is just a straightforward misreading of the article. Nobody is trying to "supress an actual scientific discovery" they are trying to clarify what has actually been discovered.