3 ms·
By the tone of your comment it's my assumption that were you alive when "wer" replaced by the gendered use of "man" I am sure you would have been all over it.
by Affric 3y ago
By the tone of your comment it's my assumption that were you alive when "wer" replaced by the gendered use of "man" I am sure you would have been all over it.
"Professional" and "well" are small targets for tech firms attempting to explain R&D to their share holders.
The pursuit of artificial intelligence is something with far deeper roots and wider ranging consequences than most pedants can imagine.
- mdp2021 3y ago> all over it Oh, the same as today, had it also happened around that time that licence got widespreadly felt as a prevailing right. > share holders If you want to sell, surely there is market for all kind of junk. We also have this need for the "real things" though. > pedants No, not pedantry: the difference is radical, between form and effectiveness. In AGI, it's the proper reasoning that makes the "real" difference - use of natural language could be useful. We want the consultant to be competent and smart, not dressed attractively and "smart".
- Affric 3y agoI had misunderstood your comment original comment. Upon rereading my original comment I take your point. Thank you for persisting.