3 ms·
FWIW, there was absolutely no attempt at spin on my part. If that $90M number was extractable from the article, I would have cited that. Clearly you agree tha
by ajross 3y ago
FWIW, there was absolutely no attempt at spin on my part. If that $90M number was extractable from the article, I would have cited that. Clearly you agree that the $735M number that appears in the headline is incorrectly spun, right?
- dghlsakjg 3y agoIt says exactly how many options were issued. Pretty easy to multiply that number times the stock price at the time the deal was made.
- woobar 3y agoI do not agree. Today Directors returned this much money, and headline correctly reflects this. If headline said something like “directors were paid $735M back in 2020” then it would be a spin.
- ajross 3y agoThey "returned" $735M, but they never "took" $735M, did they? Seems like you're digging in on the spin. Surely you agree that the distinction is relevant to the headline, right?