5 ms·
Ahah, whoops. I thought they meant "abstract data types", ie, classes - which AFAIK Go does not have. Yeah, then if they want algebraics then a functional lang
by Night_Thastus 3y ago
Ahah, whoops. I thought they meant "abstract data types", ie, classes - which AFAIK Go does not have.
Yeah, then if they want algebraics then a functional language is definitely the answer here.