3 ms·
Great, that's sloppy, probably sensationalist reporting. What does that have to do with science? Also what's your evidence that this is fraud and not just a mi
by xg15 3y ago
Great, that's sloppy, probably sensationalist reporting. What does that have to do with science?
Also what's your evidence that this is fraud and not just a mistake?
Also, oddly enough, wikipedia doesn't know anything about a 1935 heat record: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extreme_temperatures_in_Spain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_extreme_temperatures_i...
- wredue 3y agoYeah. The whole “scientists do the fraud” bullshit is just annoying. Do scientists sometimes post fraudulent results and/or claims? Sure. And they also get busted by other scientists. Is this a frequently occurring thing in the grand scheme? Absolutely not. Is probably the single most studied phenomena (climate change) to ever be under scientific scrutiny since humans became humans actually just widespread fraud and conspiracy? Not a chance.