3 ms·
Not only you provide no evidence, but also your statements are flat out wrong. Not even the founding fathers of RL (Bertsekas et al) have made such claims. RL
by whatever1 3y ago
Not only you provide no evidence, but also your statements are flat out wrong.
Not even the founding fathers of RL (Bertsekas et al) have made such claims.
RL almost always solves an approximation of the dynamic program. Aka no guarantees of consistent optimality.
RL does not guarantee constraint satisfaction.
RL needs tons of data to learn the state space and still is not enough. LPs solve nowadays Traveling salesman problems to optimality with millions of nodes. RL close to optimality for less than 1000 nodes.