> parsing through the ad hominem attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem > "Re-analysis on the statistical s

> parsing through the ad hominem attacks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem > "Re-analysis on the statistical sampling biases of a mask promotion trial in Bangladesh: a statistical replication" I'm not remotely qualified to have an opinion. That said... The open (public) process as well as the critics sharing their source code is just awesome. https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13063-022-06704-z/peer-review https://trialsjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13... https://github.com/mchikina/maskRCTnote https://github.com/mchikina/maskRCTnote I share the reviewer's hope that authors of the original study will respond.