> Ironically, in an effort to be global and inclusive we are throwing out all the languages and attempting to replace them with a single, universal iconography.

> Ironically, in an effort to be global and inclusive we are throwing out all the languages and attempting to replace them with a single, universal iconography. Meanwhile, there is also the opposite trend to enhance languages[0], supposedly also to make them more inclusive. There, too, the "UX" suffers, though for different reasons (readability, additional grammatical complexity, …). To follow your line of thought, now I'm imagining a world where, in the interest of both gender neutrality and UX, in our languages we start replacing words with icons. :eek.jpg: [0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-neutral_language https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-neutral_language https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_neutrality_in_languages_with_grammatical_gender https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_neutrality_in_languag...