3 ms·
> I'm for vouchers because I don't think I should have to pay with my taxes for religious indoctrination masquerading as public education. are you missing a N
by mcny 3y ago
> I'm for vouchers because I don't think I should have to pay with my taxes for religious indoctrination masquerading as public education.
are you missing a NOT in there? as in `I'm NOT for vouchers because I don't think I should have to pay with my taxes for religious indoctrination masquerading as public education. `?
because as it stands, your comment makes as much sense as saying
> if you are not paying for the product you are the product
Just because you are paying does not mean you are NOT the product, to spell it out.
Similarly, just because people have the option to pay for their Islamic Madrasah or whatever Jewish or Christian equivalents are with vouchers, does not mean they will not try to shove their ideologies down everyone in public education in the next election cycle.
- jdminhbg 3y ago> are you missing a NOT in there? No, I'm not. A vision of equity advanced by kneecapping math education in public schools is no less faith-based than creationism taught in private schools. If anything, I'd guess creationism is less damaging to students.