4 ms·

Please elaborate on your equivocation. On first glance, you're comparing apples and oranges, and it doesn't make much sense.

• pierat 3y ago
  [flagged]
  • LexiMax 3y ago
    Oh, so in a voucher system I would've had to choose between receiving a worthwhile education and being queer. Got it.
  • JumpCrisscross 3y ago
    > Places with public school vouchers as law allow said vouchers to be used at 100% religious schools This isn't a requirement for vouchers. You can simply state that religious schools aren't eligible.
    • LexiMax 3y ago
      What is the realistic likelyhood of this being mandated, given how many religious private schools there are and how much money they have to lobby with?
      • JumpCrisscross 3y ago
        > What is the realistic likelyhood of this being mandated Just under a third of Californian's aren't religious [1]. Nobody is proposing to ban religious schools. If you can't swing it, make the choice local. Each county or whatever can vote on whether to permit religious vouchers. The Bay Area will ban it. The Central Coast won't. This remains better than the status quo. [1] https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-study/state/california/ https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/religious-landscape-stu...
    • rfw300 3y ago
      This is incorrect as of last year: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carson_v._Makin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carson_v._Makin There is a powerful political and legal movement behind the idea that state-funded religious indoctrination is not only permitted, but required.