3 ms·
Agreed. When "free" means that you have to agree to terms that include "we can update these terms at any time at our discretion and you agree to those changes t
by gentleman11 3y ago
Agreed. When "free" means that you have to agree to terms that include "we can update these terms at any time at our discretion and you agree to those changes too," that's incredibly sketchy.
Meta's business model is "the users are not the customer, they are data sources and things to manipulate," it's especially worrying.
I don't understand the hype behind this. This whole offering is bait
- Spivak 3y agoThat's always true of OSS too and just like OSS you can always use the version you have under the terms you got it. See: macOS using an ancient version of bash to avoid GPLv3, the Elastic to OpenSearch fiasco.
- cosmojg 3y agoOnly if its license is explicitly irrevocable. Llama 2's license is the opposite, explicitly detailing Meta's ability to revoke it at any time.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]