3 ms·
It's disappointing that you're stuck using LLaMA at Meta's pleasure for their approved application. I was hoping they would show some leadership and release thi
by andy99 3y ago
It's disappointing that you're stuck using LLaMA at Meta's pleasure for their approved application. I was hoping they would show some leadership and release this under the same terms (Apache 2.0) as PyTorch and their other models, but they've chosen to go this route now which sets a horrible precedent. A future where you can only do what FAANG wants you to is pretty grim even if most of the restrictions sound benign for now. The real danger is that this will be "good enough" to stop people maintaining open alternatives like open-LLaMA. We need a GPL'd foundation model that's too good to ignore that other models can be based off of.
- yieldcrv 3y agoyeah that would be great if people were motivated to do alternatives with similar efficacy and reach