4 ms·
And, to play devils advocate, how about the other way around? How about employers who really want employees to succeed but employees who don't want to put in t
by rtp4me 3y ago
And, to play devils advocate, how about the other way around? How about employers who really want employees to succeed but employees who don't want to put in the effort? Or, how about employees who believe what reddit tells them: they are being mistreated/abused because they can't have it their way?
Based on my own personal experience, good companies want to be accommodating because they understand people truly are the most important resource. They strive for a good balance of company-vs-employee desires. Who knows, maybe I am just lucky; maybe my past 30yrs working for big-tech is an anomaly?
- 1270018080 3y ago> employers who really want employees to succeed Doesn't exist.
- rtp4me 3y agoMaybe in your world, but certainly not mine.
- dfxm12 3y agoHow about employers who really want employees to succeed but employees who don't want to put in the effort? Like the studies show, people are as productive at home as at the office. Going to the office doesn't change effort. You're also implying that one can't improve while working from home, which isn't true. Or, how about employees who believe what reddit tells them: they are being mistreated/abused because they can't have it their way? I don't know what you're talking about specifically, but at a minimum, considering wages for workers are stagnant for decades while executive pay is (way) up, it's easy to see how workers are being exploited by default.
- thesuitonym 3y agoIf the employee truly doesn't want to put in the effort, then no amount of the employer "wanting them to succeed" (Whatever that means) will make them successful. In office or not.