4 ms·
Just that you can do `|> foo()` implicitly into the first argument or, via another package mentioned in the official docs, `|> foo(_)`. This isn't necessarily
by sodapopcan 3y ago
Just that you can do `|> foo()` implicitly into the first argument or, via another package mentioned in the official docs, `|> foo(_)`. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, I was just trying to understand the comment way up this thread that said: "Writing them, you feel insecure of what is happening" as that makes no sense to me.
- sundarurfriend 3y agoAh, okay. The use of the second form requires a `@chain` macro annotation in the beginning of that expression, so I've never found this to be ambiguous.