5 ms·
And that is one recurring problem I see across HN in recent times, where people merely make comments/claims based on only reading the title and completely disre
by boarush 3y ago
And that is one recurring problem I see across HN in recent times, where people merely make comments/claims based on only reading the title and completely disregarding the contents of the article shared.
It might be that the title may be clickbait-y, but that is I guess to be expected in this day. Someone reading has the choice to just not interact if that title is too much bait.
- aCoreyJ 3y agoI have been on HN a lot more since ditching Reddit recently and somehow I think it's actually worse than Reddit with commenters not reading the article
- pc86 3y agoAt least on Reddit people make jokes. At one point the most-gilded comment ever was a (honestly, pretty funny) one-line joke reply to a paragraph long heartfelt comment about grief and loss. Here it's a loose game of word association. For example, title says "GNU" in any context so we get 300 comments with unrelated anecdotes about Stallman. The comments section becomes stories about whatever random nonsense is in the top 2-3 comments. When it was being published, n-gate[0] was great at highlighting this. [0] http://www.n-gate.com/hackernews/ http://www.n-gate.com/hackernews/
- pc86 3y agoIt has nothing to do with "in recent times," people have been doing it here for well over a decade.
- datavirtue 3y agoAt slashdot it was assumed that no one read the article before commenting.