> The reason is that transit is worse than cars always As long as 'always' is restricted to a certain lifestyle and worldview, and doesn't take into account th

> The reason is that transit is worse than cars always As long as 'always' is restricted to a certain lifestyle and worldview, and doesn't take into account the excellent transit systems that exist around the world. > And in reality it simply means that fewer people go there, because going there is miserable. The city starts converting to low income because anyone with income goes elsewhere. That's incredibly naive, and I think a lot of European cities are direct counter examples to this. It often makes things a lot less miserable for the people who actually live in the denser urban areas that were previously overrun with cars.