3 ms·
> You're missing the point. No I'm not. I know exactly the point you were making. I'm disputing it. The problem is the devil is in the details, and both the t
by tivert 3y ago
> You're missing the point.
No I'm not. I know exactly the point you were making. I'm disputing it.
The problem is the devil is in the details, and both the tired metaphor and your defense of it leave those details unspecified.
- Alupis 3y agoYou've offered zero details about why this is incorrect. You've just asserted the meme that it's "obviously wrong"... There is no good faith argument that exists to prove this incorrect.
- bandyaboot 3y agoI’m looking, but I must be missing the part where you provided details to justify your own assertion of it being obviously true.
- Alupis 3y agoTFA, among other economic articles, statistics, etc support this assertion.
- SideburnsOfDoom 3y agoThe parent article is a tweet of a graph, and it says nothing about trickle-down. > other economic articles, statistics, etc Ah well, you're wrong. "other economic articles, statistics, etc" clearly do not support this. I mean, "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence." but lets bring the citations: > trickle-down economics has never been advocated by any economist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics#Economics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickle-down_economics#Economi...