2 ms·
That's very broken; more usual practice at the time was to have large numbers of tests, aiming for good code coverage. I've sometimes seen too many full-tool te
by not2b 3y ago
That's very broken; more usual practice at the time was to have large numbers of tests, aiming for good code coverage. I've sometimes seen too many full-tool tests and few true unit tests (tests that just test functions for correctness), but "maybe 10 tests" is frightening.
- icedchai 3y agoThis particular company was very heavy on manual testing, unfortunately. (This was roughly 2003 - 2006 ish.)