3 ms·
This is two factor auth but when the "thing you own" is the standard case. I don't get why it's not a keypad and relay though. Sounds like a complex solution t
by IanCal 3y ago
This is two factor auth but when the "thing you own" is the standard case.
I don't get why it's not a keypad and relay though. Sounds like a complex solution to a fairly simple problem. I might be missing something though.
Edit - ah it's intended to work with many other options like controlling indicators or wipers or something - so you choose some pattern that is your password.
- bscphil 3y ago> it's intended to work with many other options like controlling indicators or wipers I think you're asking exactly the right question though - how is all this not just a more complex, less secure, shittier version of a keypad that you enter a 4-6 digit code on?
- ehnto 3y agoIt is also not any better than any other immobiliser. Unless it's on the CANBUS talking securely to the ECU, thieves will likely just bypass the module physically if they have the time. This coupled with a CANBUS integration with the ECU to prevent it from starting would be pretty good though, since no one can wirelessly collect the signals to spoof the code.