3 ms·
So, couldn't it be that the authors of the paper ran the model with a random tie break and got lucky? This blog post seems to assume they had the "rand" flag de
by snowstormsun 3y ago
So, couldn't it be that the authors of the paper ran the model with a random tie break and got lucky? This blog post seems to assume they had the "rand" flag deactivated. Please correct me if I am wrong.
- expensive_news 3y agoFrom what I understand in the post getting lucky enough to see that big of a change in this situation would be like getting 1000 head flips in a row. It’s not luck you could expect to ever get.
- snowstormsun 3y agoI see
- marcinzm 3y agoThe code of the paper is all on Github so you can verify that line of thinking if you want to.