3 ms·

This is a non-issue. There is a reason laws aren't written in one line.

ivanstojic 3y ago
The length of a law doesn’t reduce its murkiness - in fact it makes it more pronounced. That is why (in the common law systems) there is so much discussing and re-discussing of topics that plenty of other cases already covered, using new approach angles. If you make laws longer and more complex, you only make them serve more those that have the budget to explore all branches of the decision tree.
- digging 3y ago
  I mean, sure. Corruption exists. But the that's another issue entirely. Your comment doesn't add to the question of the GP - "does the existence of edge cases make implementing a law extremely difficult?" The answer is no. You could probably outline all the exceptions and applications of such a law in a few pages.
1propionyl 3y ago
And if you did want to write it in close to one line, it wouldn't be particularly difficult either. Simply outlaw _selling_ (or giving away) of ad space in public. You want to put your own logo on your storefront, side of vehicle, brochure, public bus, charging station? Sure. You want to sell that space to the highest bidder to place their own ad? Nope. This would eliminate 99% of billboards, bus stop ads, etc without creating any ambiguity as to whether a business is allowed to identify itself in public. One caveat might be that it would be desirable to carve out an allowance for e.g. "10% of sales go to Charity X".
- idiotsecant 3y ago
  Good news! I now am a landlord whose sole property for lease is land upon which a sign can be placed. I also offer an unrelated sign building service and my friend offers a sign painting service!
  - SoullessSilent 3y ago
    That's great. Now you can advertise your sign building service on your property.
- edmundsauto 3y ago
  If we assume advertising is ROI positive, wouldn't this quickly become a world where only the biggest companies could advertise? Apple has a large retail footprint and could buy the physical billboard footprint; my local tax accountant cannot.

The length of a law doesn’t reduce its murkiness - in fact it makes it more pronounced. That is why (in the common law systems) there is so much discussing and re-discussing of topics that plenty of other cases already covered, using new approach angles. If you make laws longer and more complex, you only make them serve more those that have the budget to explore all branches of the decision tree.

digging 3y ago
I mean, sure. Corruption exists. But the that's another issue entirely. Your comment doesn't add to the question of the GP - "does the existence of edge cases make implementing a law extremely difficult?" The answer is no. You could probably outline all the exceptions and applications of such a law in a few pages.

1propionyl 3y ago

And if you did want to write it in close to one line, it wouldn't be particularly difficult either. Simply outlaw _selling_ (or giving away) of ad space in public. You want to put your own logo on your storefront, side of vehicle, brochure, public bus, charging station? Sure. You want to sell that space to the highest bidder to place their own ad? Nope. This would eliminate 99% of billboards, bus stop ads, etc without creating any ambiguity as to whether a business is allowed to identify itself in public. One caveat might be that it would be desirable to carve out an allowance for e.g. "10% of sales go to Charity X".

idiotsecant 3y ago
Good news! I now am a landlord whose sole property for lease is land upon which a sign can be placed. I also offer an unrelated sign building service and my friend offers a sign painting service!
- SoullessSilent 3y ago
  That's great. Now you can advertise your sign building service on your property.
edmundsauto 3y ago
If we assume advertising is ROI positive, wouldn't this quickly become a world where only the biggest companies could advertise? Apple has a large retail footprint and could buy the physical billboard footprint; my local tax accountant cannot.