4 ms·

Nope. This is why pedestrians die. Force cars to go slower in cities. They recently added a pedestrian island in the road near where I live. It is not unnotice

• josephcsible 3y ago
  If you want to make pedestrians safer, you can do that without having to make driving miserable, by building elevated pedestrian walkways.
  • tekla 3y ago
    Or reclaim street space from cars at infinitely cheaper initial cost, time, and effort.
  • CalRobert 3y ago
    And how do I walk in to a shop from this walkway?
    • josephcsible 3y ago
      By walking back down the ramp from it to the regular sidewalk. I just meant I want to add elevated walkways to cross streets with, not for them to replace sidewalks entirely.
      • retzkek 3y ago
        I assume you mean for crossing busy roads and highways, not city streets? Certainly there are places for that, like Chicago's Lake Shore Drive. They're expensive and take a lot of space themselves, though, especially to meet accessibility requirements, and they can add considerable distance to the pedestrian's route. Otherwise, what you're describing sounds like someone looked at this well-circulated cartoon and said "hey that's a great idea! Just raise the planks by 15 feet!" https://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/11/18/7236471/cars-pedestrians-sidewalks-roads https://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/11/18/7236471/cars-pedestria...
  • daveliepmann 3y ago
    Elevated pedestrian walkways are miserable for people walking. You seem pretty deeply carbrained.
    • josephcsible 3y ago
      How so? I've used them before and didn't see a problem with them.
      • daveliepmann 3y ago
        How are they for a grandparents pushing a stroller? Would you say they encourage a vibrant street culture of cafes and shops? The ones I've seen, especially in Berlin and İzmir, are loud and a hassle to cross. That's because walkways and bikeways over multi-lane roads are car infrastructure. They are there to prioritize high-speed automobile traffic with few interruptions. I'm happy for the one going up at my gym, but I know it's there to ensure bike/ped political forces can't endanger the trunk road underneath. True pedestrian infrastructure there would involve a major speed and size downgrade to the road, which is unacceptable, thus the political defensive move to pay out the nose for something car advocates would never normally fund.
  • MandieD 3y ago
    Elevated/buried pedestrian walkways make walking harder for a lot of people. A wheelchair-accessible ramp that goes up 12 feet is going to add at least 100 feet more distance up and down - and still be painful for a lot of people with otherwise manageable foot/joint issues. Pushing a stroller for the last few years, plus spraining my ankle a few weeks ago has given me a little taste of what trying to use sidewalks is like for people with even tighter mobility constraints, and this in an area that is relatively accessible without a car.
• ars 3y ago
  > Make car life in cities miserable. Make life in cities miserable, is more accurate. The reason is that transit is worse than cars always. If you make travel in cars worse, then all you did is make life worse for everyone. And in reality it simply means that fewer people go there, because going there is miserable. The city starts converting to low income because anyone with income goes elsewhere.
  • Chilko 3y ago
    > The reason is that transit is worse than cars always As long as 'always' is restricted to a certain lifestyle and worldview, and doesn't take into account the excellent transit systems that exist around the world. > And in reality it simply means that fewer people go there, because going there is miserable. The city starts converting to low income because anyone with income goes elsewhere. That's incredibly naive, and I think a lot of European cities are direct counter examples to this. It often makes things a lot less miserable for the people who actually live in the denser urban areas that were previously overrun with cars.