2 ms·
I only did depth=1 because the syntax doesnt change, i still don't see a difference to speak of css: div:has( > \* > \* > \* > \* > \* > \* > \* > #the-ch
by 411111111111111 3y ago
I only did depth=1 because the syntax doesnt change, i still don't see a difference to speak of
css:
div:has( > \* > \* > \* > \* > \* > \* > \* > #the-child)
(backslashes added by hn because of formatting conflict)
xpath:
//div[@id="the-child"]/../../../../../../../..