3 ms·
"Well they could do things to harm themselves [because we treat non-profit employees like they implicitly have a wealthy spouse or should live in a shoebox]" is
by eropple 3y ago
"Well they could do things to harm themselves [because we treat non-profit employees like they implicitly have a wealthy spouse or should live in a shoebox]" is also not helping the argument very much.
One does not need to be a Stylite to have an opinion on society; comparing the actions of individuals, without significant power or influence, with corporate-fiction persons that come equipped with lobbying arms and sufficiently dispersed decision-making power that nasty shit comes out of them regularly, is not and never persuasive.
- scarface_74 3y agoIt’s called having the courage of your convictions. Plenty of people live off of non profit salaries without having a wealthy spouse or even do public sector work.
- ClumsyPilot 3y ago[flagged]
- scarface_74 3y agoBut in this case, he’s actually making a living by working in a gun shop when he has other (less lucrative) options.
- eropple 3y ago[flagged]
- scarface_74 3y ago[flagged]
- ClumsyPilot 3y agoNot at all. Suppose you believe corporations are out of control, and it's on, what the best way to hurt them? Work for a charity and live in poverty? Become a hermit and live in a forest? no! Find the corporation tou hate most and get a job there. Do damage from the inside, sleep with the boss, work your way up, drive it bancrupt. Cause it to loose all talent. Work in two places at once, and do nothing in both jobs. Something like that