3 ms·
The point is to discourage use of certain vehicles, not to fund anything. But yes, truck used to haul building materials for a building site is the vehicle ful
by ilyt 3y ago
The point is to discourage use of certain vehicles, not to fund anything.
But yes, truck used to haul building materials for a building site is the vehicle fulfilling its purpose and any replacement for that purpose being suboptimal.
Truck bought to haul 2 bags of groceries is not. Tax the second one.
- AnthonyMouse 3y ago> Truck bought to haul 2 bags of groceries is not. Tax the second one. How do you do this without taxing the first one? If someone buys a truck to haul building materials to a building site, they are understandably not going to buy a separate vehicle just to haul 2 bags of groceries. But then how do you know what anybody is using it for the rest of the time? The list of legitimate purposes is unlimited. You're a homeowner who is into gardening and always bringing home mulch and saplings and renting landscaping equipment for projects. You're a retrocomputing enthusiast whose hobby requires you to be constantly transporting old mainframes. You're a parent who has to transport an entire junior varsity soccer team to practice every night. How do you propose to distinguish any of these from someone who only buys a tank to carry home groceries?