3 ms·
When you factor in the fact that this company has (knowingly) killed multiple times more people than Osama Bin Laden, maybe it's not “over the top”…
by littlestymaar 3y ago
When you factor in the fact that this company has (knowingly) killed multiple times more people than Osama Bin Laden, maybe it's not “over the top”…
- Panzer04 3y agoIn what way have they done that? I'm sure there.must be a massive lawsuit about it.
- littlestymaar 3y agoDidn't you even skim the article? There's a short summary at the beginning: > J&J is facing more than 38,000 lawsuits alleging that the company's talc products, including its Baby Powder, were contaminated by asbestos and caused cancers including ovarian cancer and mesothelioma
- Panzer04 3y agoRight, but these judgements have yet to be levied. The problem they are solving with this maneuver is ensuring a common/fair result for the people suing, without the "unreasonable" step of declaring bankruptcy on the company as a whole without actual obligations. As other comments have mentioned, Matt Levine has an excellent article describing the logic behind their actions.