4 ms·
And the problem with the article is it doesn't discuss virtually any of those. How are we publishing papers on batteries in 2023 without making these things obv
by laserbeam 3y ago
And the problem with the article is it doesn't discuss virtually any of those. How are we publishing papers on batteries in 2023 without making these things obvious in the abstract?
During the first 5 seconds of reading a publication on batteries I should be able to answer at least 1 or 2 of those questions.
- DrScientist 3y agoEh? Did you read it? Note the article is a summary of the research, not the research itself.
- passwordoops 3y agoAnd in the first paragraph the PR article should mention all these numbers and how they compare to the existing batteries the "breakthrough" is purporting to replace
- wiz21c 3y agoDo some standardized tests exist ? I know there are some for some neural net problems.
- laserbeam 3y agoyeah, I'm talking about the summary, not the research. The summary really should cover that, in very obvious ways. Otherwise I'll assume the authors/publishers want to hide their bad results. You kinda have to brag about them.
- CyberDildonics 3y agoEh? Which of those did it talk about?