>> After 70 years of trying we haven't built an economic traditional nuclear reactor. > Are you saying that was a true statement? As the op, yes. See: The li

>> After 70 years of trying we haven't built an economic traditional nuclear reactor. > Are you saying that was a true statement? As the op, yes. See: The limited liability vs Fukushima cost of at least $150B. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price%E2%80%93Anderson_Nuclear_Industries_Indemnity_Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price%E2%80%93Anderson_Nuclear... And this review of the economics by DIW berlin. > According to “numerous scientific studies,” none of the world’s more than 600 nuclear power stations have ever been economically viable, and the plants could only be operated for years due to government subsidies, the institute claims. https://www.rechargenews.com/transition/-nuclear-has-never-been-economic-and-is-dangerous-study/2-1-644297 https://www.rechargenews.com/transition/-nuclear-has-never-b...