4 ms·
> Were the subjects actually exposed in a meaningful way to another source of asbestos, or did the corporate lawyers go fishing through past address history, pu
by mkagenius 3y ago
> Were the subjects actually exposed in a meaningful way to another source of asbestos, or did the corporate lawyers go fishing through past address history, purchases, etc.
Ideally that should be part of the research paper if done diligently, refuting them even before people doubt them.
- notahacker 3y agoSure, but if people carrying out research were required to forensically examine the history of every research participant to the standard of a corporate law firm trying to find an angle to sue them, no research would ever be done.
- danuker 3y agohttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317550/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317550/ > The present study has several limitations. It is both retrospective and uncontrolled, and the cases were submitted in medico‐legal consultation, all of which potentially introduce bias. I think the researchers were quite open about what they did.