3 ms·
If they literally mean safety then perhaps Golang fits the bill but they said safety _like Rust_. They probably still want the control that Rust provides.
by jayd16 3y ago
If they literally mean safety then perhaps Golang fits the bill but they said safety _like Rust_. They probably still want the control that Rust provides.
- rockwotj 3y agoHonestly simplicity and having syntax to teach a compiler how to reason about all the lifetimes you need in a real program are at odds. I love rust but I think it's fundamentally complex
- vacuity 3y agoFor sure, and I think different people may understate or overstate its complexity. It's definitely worse than Go but it's not nearly a field of landmines like C++. I think it's quite feasible to learn the basics in a short period of time, but maybe that's just me. I guess we'll see how Vale and the others turn out in production.